Transitional Justice in Albania, Kosovo, and North Macedonia in a Comparative Framework

Authors

  • Arian Dedej Ph.D, Department of Public Administration, Aleksander Moisiu University, Durres, Albania
  • Ines Stasa Ph.D, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Epoka University, Tirana, Albania
  • Marco Cilento Ph.D, Department of Communication and Social Research, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0056

Keywords:

Transitional Justice, Albania, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Comparative framework

Abstract

This thesis aims to enhance transitional justice studies with a focus on the Balkan peninsula, by providing a comparative analysis of the extent of transitional justice mechanisms in Albania, Kosovo, and North Macedonia. With the fall of military dictatorships in Latin America in the 1980s, the breakup of the Soviet Union, and the emergence of new states in the 1990s, the concept of Transitional Justice (TJ) saw a significant rise in the late 1980s and early 1990s. This was further propelled by the fall of the Berlin Wall (1989), the prolonged breakup of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (1992) as well as the fall of the communist dictatorship in Albania (1990). The emergence of new states and the state-building processes that followed the political and social changes also brought new challenges and conflicts, although they marked the end of significantly repressive political regimes. Considering that the implementation of TJ has undergone several changes over time and is dependent on the different settings in which it was employed, it is necessary to conduct extensive comparative research to determine the extent to which TJ differs in post-communist and post-conflict nations. The study has developed three main hypotheses: (1) The limited achievement of lustration law in Albania has conditioned the current status of transitional justice; (2) The state-building process has contributed to the evolution of Transitional Justice in Kosovo; (3) The power-sharing process as a TJ pillar in North Macedonia has fueled TJ in the country. By utilizing a mixed methods approach, data was collected through elite interviews, conducted in the three countries with 44 representatives from academia, politics, media, and civil society. To conclude, two hypotheses are fully upheld in terms of the limited achievement of lustration law and its implications with the current status of transitional justice in Albania; and the contribution of state-building in Kosovo to the evolution of transitional justice. The third hypothesis related to the power-sharing process in North Macedonia as a fueling mechanism for the evolution of transitional justice is partially upheld. 

 

Received: 13 February 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Transitional Justice in Albania, Kosovo, and North Macedonia in a Comparative Framework. (2024). Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(3), 71. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0056