Formulating Sustainable Watershed Governance Model: A Meta-analysis of Watershed Governance

Authors

  • Tri Sulistyaningsih Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Achmad Nurmandi Goverment Affairs and Administration, Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Kamil Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Ali Roziqin Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Salahudin Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Jainuri Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Iradhad Taqwa Sihidi Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Ach. Apriyanto Romadhan Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Jafar Loilatu Goverment Affairs and Administration, Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0041

Keywords:

Watershed Governance, Environment, Nvivo, Conceptualization

Abstract

Currently watershed governance still involves many stakeholders from different territories, ranging from local to cross-country, and also, different social, political, cultural, and economic factors. Therefore, this study aims to categorize the themes or concepts related to watershed management studies. Through descriptive analysis and the help of the Nvivo-12 software, 383 Scopus indexed paper articles, which were published by major publishers such as Emerald, MDPI, Sage, ScienceDirect, Springer, Taylor and Francis, were obtained. The results indicate that there are 155 concepts in the watershed governance study, and they can be categorized into 6 groups. Furthermore, they are also related to dominant themes such as water resources, governance, watershed, environment, local issue, and policy. The significance of this study is the discovery of the concept of watershed governance studies; therefore, it can assist in the development of conceptual frameworks in future studies. Meanwhile, the limitation of this study is that the articles it reviewed were obtained from only the Scopus database, therefore, it does not have comparable data. Consequently, future studies need to use a comparative analysis approach which involves both the Scopus and the Web of Sciences (WoS) databases.

 

Received: 8 November 2020 / Accepted: 19 December 2020 / Published: 5 March 2021

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

05-03-2021

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Formulating Sustainable Watershed Governance Model: A Meta-analysis of Watershed Governance. (2021). Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0041